Open in the interactive app →

God & Science

Couldn't our universe have come from another universe?

Short answer

That only moves the question back a step. If our universe came from a parent universe, a black hole, an earlier cycle, or a computer simulation, then that too needs an explanation. The evidence points to a beginning even for a larger multiverse, and an endless chain of universes still can't explain why anything exists at all. The ultimate cause must be uncaused, timeless, and beyond every physical universe, which is what we mean by God.

In simple words: Even if our world came from another world, someone still had to make the very first one. That's God.

Response

You may have seen headlines like "Our universe may have been born inside a black hole." In 2025, a team at the University of Portsmouth published a theoretical model suggesting our universe formed when matter collapsed inside a black hole in a larger "parent" universe, then rebounded. Similar ideas have circulated for years:

These ideas are interesting, and some are serious scientific proposals. But none of them replaces God, for a simple reason: they move the question back without answering it. If our universe came from a black hole, where did the black hole and its parent universe come from? If we're in a simulation, who made the simulators' universe? Each answer is another physical thing that needs its own explanation. Either the chain goes back forever, or it ends in a first cause that isn't another universe.

The evidence points to a beginning for the whole chain. In 2003, physicists Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin showed that any universe that has, on average, been expanding, including a larger multiverse, cannot be infinitely old under the physics we know. Scientists debate what might lie beyond that boundary, and some hope a future theory of quantum gravity will change the picture, but no model of an eternal past has won acceptance. Vilenkin has said, "All the evidence we have says that the universe had a beginning." Bounce models face a further problem: disorder (entropy) builds up from cycle to cycle, so an infinite series of past cycles would have run down long ago.

Even an infinite chain wouldn't explain itself. Picture a train with endless boxcars: making it longer doesn't explain why it moves. You need an engine. Every universe in the chain is contingent (it might not have existed), so the whole chain needs an explanation beyond itself: a necessary, uncaused being.

The simulation and "alien creator" versions have the same problem. Any simulator or super-intelligent being inside some universe is still a physical, dependent creature in a world that needs explaining, fine-tuning included. Such beings also could not ground objective right and wrong. Only an eternal, uncaused, personal Creator ends the chain.

Finally, none of this threatens the Christian faith. If other universes do exist, God made them too. Through Christ "all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible" (Colossians 1:16). The question isn't how big creation is, but why there is a creation at all.

Key evidence

Bible passages

Quotes

“All the evidence we have says that the universe had a beginning.”

Physicist Alexander Vilenkin, quoted in New Scientist (January 2012)

Discussion questions

  1. Why doesn't adding more universes answer the question of where everything came from?
  2. What does the boxcar illustration show about an infinite chain of causes?
  3. If scientists confirmed other universes tomorrow, would that change what Christians believe? Why or why not?

Related questions